For the Quarter Ending September 2025
APAC
鈥� In Malaysia, the Butyl Glycol Price Index fell by 3.02% quarter-over-quarter, driven by ample supply.
鈥� The average Butyl Glycol price for the quarter was approximately USD 1070.00/MT FOB Klang, reported.
鈥� Butyl Glycol Spot Price showed recovery in August as tighter regional availability supported short-term export realizations.
鈥� Butyl Glycol Price Forecast indicates volatility ahead driven by feedstock swings and seasonal coatings demand variability.
鈥� Butyl Glycol Production Cost Trend registered upward pressure from ethylene oxide and crude-linked feedstock fluctuations.
鈥� Butyl Glycol Demand Outlook remained mixed with construction-driven coatings supportive while automotive segment exhibited weakness.
鈥� Butyl Glycol Price Index movements reflected balanced local production and Asian export offers pressuring margins.
鈥� Inventory builds and efficient Port Klang logistics limited upside, while selective restocking supported occasional upward momentum.
Why did the price of Butyl Glycol change in September 2025 in APAC?
鈥� Butyl Glycol uptick was fueled by robust downstream demand, particularly from the paints and coatings sector,聽
鈥� Soft automotive production and plant shutdowns curtailed downstream offtake, notably diminishing short-term domestic consumption significantly.
鈥� A modest recovery in ethylene oxide feedstock costs and tightening regional supply chains
USA
鈥� In the United States, the Butyl Glycol Price Index declined quarter-over-quarter, reflecting subdued industrial activity and competitive import offers.聽
鈥� Butyl Glycol Spot Price remained under pressure through July and August, but showed mild stabilization in September amid restocking by coatings manufacturers.聽
鈥� Butyl Glycol Price Forecast suggests a cautiously stable trend into Q4, with potential upside from infrastructure-led coatings demand and winter restocking.聽
鈥� Butyl Glycol Production Cost Trend eased slightly in late Q3 as ethylene oxide prices moderated and natural gas input costs declined.聽
鈥� Butyl Glycol Demand Outlook was mixed鈥攃onstruction coatings and cleaning agents supported volumes, while automotive and printing sectors remained sluggish.聽
鈥� Butyl Glycol Price Index movements reflected a balance between domestic production and increased import competition from Asia and Latin America.聽
鈥� Inventory levels remained elevated across Gulf Coast terminals, limiting price recovery despite seasonal procurement from the architectural coatings segment.
Why did the price of Butyl Glycol change in September 2025 in the USA?聽
鈥� A modest rebound in coatings demand, particularly from the construction sector, helped stabilize prices after earlier softness.聽
鈥� Lower feedstock costs and high inventory levels capped any significant upward movement in spot offers.聽
鈥� Competitive imports and weak demand from automotive and printing applications continued to weigh on domestic margins.
Europe
鈥� In Germany, the Butyl Glycol Price Index fell by 4.3% quarter-over-quarter, reflecting cost-driven easing overall.
鈥� The average Butyl Glycol price for the quarter was approximately USD 1400/MT, FOB Hamburg basis.
鈥� German demand resilience limited Butyl Glycol Spot Price downside despite weak regional Price Index signals.
鈥� Short-term Butyl Glycol Price Forecast indicates mild recovery pressure driven by seasonal coatings restocking activity.
鈥� Easing ethylene oxide costs moderated the Butyl Glycol Production Cost Trend, supporting modest margin improvement.
鈥� Butyl Glycol Demand Outlook remains mixed, with automotive coatings firm while decorative coatings showing weakness.
鈥� High inventories and steady export flows pressured offers, constraining rebound despite localized port congestion effects.
鈥� Selective maintenance at regional plants intermittently tightened supply, temporarily supporting Butyl Glycol Price Index firming.
Why did the price of Butyl Glycol change in September 2025 in Europe?
鈥� Regional ethylene oxide weakness reduced production costs, feeding lower offers and pressuring regional Price Index.
鈥� Hamburg port congestion delayed shipments, creating localized tightness but insufficient to reverse overall downward price momentum.
鈥� Demand unevenness across coatings, steady exports, and seller destocking drove net price decline across markets.
MEA
鈥� In Saudi Arabia, the Butyl Glycol Price Index fell by 6.29% quarter-over-quarter, reflecting supply-led oversupply.
鈥� The average Butyl Glycol price for the quarter was approximately USD 918.33/MT on an FOB Jeddah basis.
鈥� Butyl Glycol Spot Price softened due to elevated inventories and buying, pressuring spot offers across exporters.
鈥� Butyl Glycol Price Forecast indicates modest recovery mid-Q4 as seasonal demand and destocking rebalance inventories.
鈥� Butyl Glycol Production Cost Trend eased as ethylene oxide feedstock prices declined, supporting producer margins and output.
鈥� Butyl Glycol Demand Outlook remains supported by Expo 2030 construction and automotive refinishing, despite short-term moderation.
鈥� Butyl Glycol Price Index volatility moderated as Sadara outage impact was offset by inventory buffers and imports.
鈥� Export demand fluctuation and Red Sea logistics delays constrained flows, intensifying seller competition and discounting.
Why did the price of Butyl Glycol change in September 2025 in MEA?
鈥� Increased seller competition created upward pressure on spot offers and contractual renewals.
鈥� Port congestion at Jeddah lengthened delivery times, adding mild upward pressure on logistics costs.聽
鈥� Reflecting improved business conditions, with new export orders rising due to stronger demand from Asia-Pacific markets.
For the Quarter Ending June 2025
Asia-Pacific (South Korea)
鈥� Butyl Glycol Price Index in South Korea dropped 10.3% quarter-on-quarter, closing at USD 1178/MT FOB Busan by June 2025.
鈥� Why did the price of Butyl Glycol change in July 2025 in South Korea?
In July 2025, prices declined further due to sustained oversupply and lacklustre demand from the construction and coatings segments during monsoon season.
鈥� Butyl Glycol Spot Price adjustments were driven by reduced industrial output, a subdued paints sector, and limited restocking appetite.
鈥� The Butyl Glycol Production Cost Trend was favourable due to falling ethylene oxide prices and cautious output levels to mitigate oversupply.
鈥� The Butyl Glycol Demand Outlook remained soft with paints/coatings demand weak, despite relatively steady automotive sector activity.
Europe (Germany)
鈥� Butyl Glycol Price Index in Germany fell 2.7% quarter-on-quarter to USD 1415/MT FOB Hamburg.
鈥� Why did the price of Butyl Glycol change in July 2025 in Germany?
In July 2025, prices declined as weak decorative coatings demand, stable production, and improving feedstock availability reduced price support.
鈥� Despite some logistical constraints at Hamburg port, oversupply conditions persisted, softening the Butyl Glycol Spot Price.
鈥� The Butyl Glycol Production Cost Trend improved due to easing ethylene oxide costs.
鈥� The Demand Outlook remained steady in automotive and industrial coatings but lacked strength in the construction-linked decorative segment.
MEA (Saudi Arabia)
鈥� Butyl Glycol Price Index dropped 3.3% quarter-on-quarter to USD 870/MT FOB Jeddah by June 2025.
鈥� Why did the price of Butyl Glycol change in July 2025 in Saudi Arabia?
In July 2025, prices softened further due to rising inventories and competitive seller activity, even though demand from infrastructure projects stayed firm.
鈥� Butyl Glycol Spot Price declined marginally in early Q3 as supply outpaced consumption.
鈥� The Production Cost Trend remained favourable with falling ethylene oxide prices, allowing consistent manufacturing despite margin pressure.
鈥� The Butyl Glycol Demand Outlook stayed firm, bolstered by Expo 2030-related coatings consumption and stable automotive refinishing demand.
North America (United States)聽
鈥� Butyl Glycol Price Index in North America showed a marginal decline in Q2, mirroring the trends observed worldwide.
鈥� Why did the price of Butyl Glycol change in July 2025 in USA?
The July 2025 price increase was modest and largely driven by seasonal coatings demand, limited domestic inventories, and scheduled maintenance at one of the Gulf Coast鈥檚 major glycol ether production units.
鈥� Butyl Glycol Spot Price firmed slightly as exporters leveraged strong summer consumption in Southeast Asia and Mexico, combined with tighter inventories in parts of Europe.
鈥� The Butyl Glycol Production Cost Trend was moderately bullish, reflecting increased feedstock ethylene oxide prices and regional logistics surcharges due to persistent trucking constraints in the Gulf Coast.
鈥� The Butyl Glycol Demand Outlook remains stable to optimistic, supported by coatings activity, restocking in export markets like Mexico and Southeast Asia, and rising inquiries from Europe amid reduced Asian shipments.
鈥� U.S.-based producers maintained a strong export posture, capitalizing on logistical advantages and regulatory flexibility relative to European suppliers.聽
For the Quarter Ending March 2025
North America
In Q1 2025, the U.S. Butyl Glycol market saw a steady upward price trend, driven by robust demand from key industries such as paints, coatings, and automotive manufacturing. These sectors were supported by ongoing infrastructure projects and the overall recovery of industrial activities in the U.S. Despite these positive demand factors, the market was pressured by rising production costs, mainly due to increasing feedstock prices, particularly ethylene oxide, which exerted upward pressure on Butyl Glycol prices throughout the quarter.
Supply-side dynamics played a significant role in shaping the market conditions. Although there were challenges related to feedstock availability and logistical constraints, production facilities operated at steady capacity levels. Some plants underwent scheduled maintenance shutdowns, further tightening supply, which, combined with the increased demand from industrial applications, resulted in a stable yet rising price trajectory during the quarter.
By the end of Q1 2025, the Butyl Glycol market in the U.S. had reached a relatively stable position. Prices had risen incrementally throughout the quarter, reflecting the ongoing balance of strong industrial demand and constrained supply, exacerbated by the higher costs of key raw materials. This set the tone for cautious optimism going into Q2, with a market that remained resilient despite external pressures.
APAC
In Q1 2025, the Malaysian Butyl Glycol market saw a mild upward trend in pricing, increasing by approximately 0.8% in January. This was driven by supply constraints and rising production costs, especially due to higher ethylene oxide prices. Demand remained stable in the paints and coatings sector, primarily driven by infrastructure projects and industrial investments. However, the automotive sector saw a temporary slowdown in coatings demand due to weaker vehicle sales, with a 38.7% drop in sales in January, impacting the overall demand for Butyl Glycol.
By February, the market showed modest improvement, with prices increasing by around 0.8%. Manufacturing activity saw an uptick, but weaker export orders limited broader market growth. The paints and coatings sector continued to experience steady demand, but the shift towards low-VOC and water-based formulations created challenges for traditional solvent use. The automotive sector showed signs of recovery, with some seasonal demand providing short-term relief, though overall sales were still subdued.
By the end of the quarter in March, the market stabilized with a slight 1.3% decline in prices. Improved feedstock availability from the ethylene oxide market, coupled with steady manufacturing output, allowed for balanced supply conditions. Demand in the automotive and paints sectors remained positive, but cautious buying behaviour kept the market in a stable condition. Overall, Q1 2025 saw steady demand and gradual price adjustments across key sectors.
Europe
In Q1 2025, the German Butyl Glycol market saw a significant decline in prices, with a 2.2% decrease in January. This drop was driven by weak demand from key sectors like automotive and paints and coatings, which faced challenges from high inflation, rising material costs, and economic uncertainty. Despite a reduction in ethylene oxide prices easing some production costs, these broader market constraints led to reduced demand and a cautious purchasing attitude across industries.
The downward trend continued in February, with a further 4.0% drop in prices. This was largely due to ongoing softness in the automotive sector and the shift towards sustainable, low-VOC alternatives in the paints and coatings market. Regulatory pressures, alongside the transition to greener solutions, further reduced the demand for traditional solvents. As a result, manufacturers adjusted their strategies, reducing production and procurement to align with the weaker demand.
Towards the end of the quarter, the market showed signs of stabilization, with a slight 1.8% increase in prices. This uptick was attributed to logistical challenges at the Port of Hamburg, raising concerns about potential supply disruptions. A rebound in the automotive sector, with a 24.6% increase in vehicle sales, also contributed to a modest recovery in demand for coatings and adhesives, though uncertainty in the broader market remained.
惭贰础听
In Q1 2025, the price trend of Butyl Glycol in Saudi Arabia showed moderate fluctuations driven by strong industrial demand and supply-side dynamics. In January, prices increased by 1.0%, primarily due to robust demand from key sectors like paints, coatings, and automotive, supported by Saudi Arabia鈥檚 Vision 2030. The growing non-oil economy and infrastructure projects fuelled consumption, while rising ethylene oxide prices put upward pressure on production costs, contributing to the price hike.
The trend continued in February, with another 1.0% increase in prices. Stable industrial activity and sustained demand in the paints and coatings sector, driven by ongoing infrastructure development, supported the price increase. The automotive sector, particularly electric vehicle production, further contributed to consumption growth. However, environmental regulations promoting eco-friendly alternatives presented long-term uncertainties for traditional solvents, adding complexity to the market.
By March, the market shifted, with a 1.0% decline in prices. This drop was mainly due to oversupply, with ample domestic production and strategic stockpiling outweighing the steady demand. Despite continued strength in the local construction and automotive sectors, weak export demand contributed to an excess supply situation. This price correction reflects a balanced market where supply growth outpaced demand, though long-term demand remains positive driven by ongoing industrial and economic developments.
For the Quarter Ending December 2024
North America
In Q4 2024, the Butyl Glycol market in the North American region exhibited a steady yet subdued performance, reflecting weak demand across major downstream sectors. The market faced headwinds due to softening consumption in key industries such as paints and coatings, automotive, and construction. The seasonal slowdown in construction activities, combined with declining production volumes in the automotive sector, weighed heavily on the demand for Butyl Glycol, a critical solvent in these industries. Additionally, high inventory levels from earlier in the year further limited the need for new procurement, contributing to a cautious purchasing environment.
On the supply side, North American production remained stable throughout the quarter, with manufacturers maintaining consistent operational rates. Feedstock prices, particularly ethylene oxide, remained relatively stable, which helped control production costs. However, the absence of significant export demand exacerbated the oversupply situation, creating further downward pressure on market dynamics.
Although the paints and coatings industry experienced moderate activity driven by residential maintenance projects, the overall market sentiment remained lackluster. With slower economic growth and limited industrial activity in the region, market participants adopted a wait-and-see approach. The quarter concluded with the North American Butyl Glycol market facing a delicate balance between steady supply and weaker downstream demand.
APAC
In Q4 2024, the South Korean Butyl Glycol market experienced a quarter-on-quarter decline of 2.9%, driven by weak demand from key downstream industries such as paints and coatings and the automotive sector. Domestic demand for paints and coatings remained subdued, reflecting low consumer confidence and competitive pricing pressures, while the automotive sector faced reduced production and declining sales. Export demand also softened, highlighting a broader downturn in consumer confidence across the APAC region. On the supply side, declining feedstock prices, particularly Ethylene Oxide, reduced production costs for manufacturers. However, the resulting cost savings did not stimulate market activity, as procurement remained demand-driven with sufficient inventories in place. Increased competition among suppliers further pressured prices. While Asia's paints and coatings sector demonstrated long-term growth potential through overseas expansion and innovation, domestic demand in South Korea lagged during this period. The combined effects of weakened downstream demand, subdued export activity, and reduced production costs created a challenging market environment for Butyl Glycol in South Korea throughout Q4 2024.
Europe
In Q4 2024, the German Butyl Glycol market experienced a quarter-on-quarter decline of 1.2%, driven by subdued demand from key downstream sectors such as automotive and construction, alongside fluctuating dynamics in the paints and coatings industry. The automotive sector, facing declining new passenger car registrations and weakened production activity, contributed significantly to the sluggish market conditions. Similarly, the construction sector continued to grapple with challenges, limiting its demand for Butyl Glycol. On the other hand, the paints and coatings sector showed some resilience, particularly in December, when strategic measures by major industry players and a recovery in demand bolstered market activity. Companies like AkzoNobel and BASF implemented cost-cutting initiatives and portfolio optimizations to enhance competitiveness amidst economic uncertainties. These efforts supported a modest recovery in the sector, driving demand for Butyl Glycol in Germany during the latter part of the quarter. Supply dynamics remained steady, with sufficient availability of Butyl Glycol despite reduced production activities. The interplay of controlled production, improving demand in the coatings sector, and persistent challenges in other industries shaped the overall bearish market sentiment in Germany during Q4 2024.
MEA
In Q4 2024, the Butyl Glycol market in Saudi Arabia witnessed a significant quarter-on-quarter decline of 17.8%, driven by high inventory levels, oversupply, and subdued international demand. While domestic demand remained steady, especially from the construction and automotive sectors, the preference for environmentally friendly alternatives鈥攁ligned with Saudi Arabia鈥檚 Vision 2030 sustainability goals鈥攃urbed consumption of volatile organic compounds (VOCs) like Butyl Glycol. Supply dynamics were affected by constrained production due to adverse weather conditions, yet inventory surpluses continued to exert downward pressure on prices. The paints and coatings sector benefited from robust infrastructure projects, though companies emphasized sustainable innovations and reduced VOC usage. Global players like AkzoNobel and BASF explored opportunities in the region, highlighting its growing importance in the global coatings market. Meanwhile, the automotive sector, bolstered by initiatives such as Lucid Motors joining Saudi Arabia鈥檚 "Made in Saudi" program, showcased consistent demand for Butyl Glycol despite broader market challenges. Overall, the bearish sentiment persisted, reflecting the interplay of oversupply, weak international demand, and a structural shift toward sustainability.
